This column is for Callaway Climate Insights subscribers only, but it’s OK to share once in a while. Was it shared with you? Please subscribe.

(Michael Molinski is a senior economist at Trendline Economics. He’s worked for Fidelity, Charles Schwab and Wells Fargo, and previously as a foreign correspondent and editor for Bloomberg News and MarketWatch.)
BELEM, Brazil (Callaway Climate Insights) — COP30 ended with a fizzle rather than with the concrete, far-reaching agreement to save the Amazon rainforest and the world from climate change — which was Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s goal and that of many others.
In the end, COP30 ended with a watered-down, compromise climate deal that didn’t even mention fossil fuels, the biggest drivers of climate change.
Brazil’s flagship investment fund, the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF), raised a paltry $7.7 billion, well below the $25 billion target.
And trade, which became a more hotly contested topic at Belém than it had been at other climate change conferences, was pushed out of the agenda and relegated to future discussions.
COP30 was billed as a significant opportunity for Latin America to lead in climate change negotiations. Did it do that?

