Callaway Climate Insights

Callaway Climate Insights

Share this post

Callaway Climate Insights
Callaway Climate Insights
How Supreme Court's Chevron ruling will define election year climate politics
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

How Supreme Court's Chevron ruling will define election year climate politics

Plus, Tesla's troublesome start to 2024

David Callaway's avatar
David Callaway
Jan 16, 2024
∙ Paid
11

Share this post

Callaway Climate Insights
Callaway Climate Insights
How Supreme Court's Chevron ruling will define election year climate politics
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

In today’s edition:

— A Supreme Court hearing this week could throw climate politics into chaos this election year
— Tesla shares are off to their worst start in their history
— Making auto parts from olive trees? Ford is taking a look in the EU
— New York tries using old gas pipelines to push heat from heat pumps
— Forget Kansas City, Chiefs fans. This town was the coldest in the U.S. this past weekend
Lava flows from a volcanic eruption in southwestern Iceland have destroyed homes and forced residents to flee the town of Grindavík. Photo: Almannavarnir Civil Protection/Björn Oddsson/via Icelandic Met Office.

Climate politics was always going to be a feature of the 2024 election year, but a Supreme Court ruling on a case heard this week threatens to divide red and blue states on environmental regulation — and more — in the biggest way since Roe v. Wade was overturned two years ago.

In a hearing Wednesday on a case about a legal doctrine known as the Chevron deference, the court will potentially decide whether federal regulatory agencies have the authority to interpret laws passed by Congress as they implement them. A ruling against the doctrine, which has been in place since 1984, would effectively allow state and local judges to interpret laws their own way, and dramatically weaken agencies ranging from the EPA to the SEC.

The high court decided 40 years ago that too many lower court judges were interpreting federal law along their own political party lines, and so the power of federal agencies was greatly expanded. Going back to that standard, while it cuts both ways depending on which state you are in, would throw climate regulation into chaos just as the election campaigns hit high gear.

The high court has a lot on its plate this session, but if it stuck to its tradition of ruling within 90 days of an oral hearing, we’d get a decision in mid-April. For investors hoping that a new era of lower interest rates will help clean technology projects gain momentum across the country, especially those tied to government funding from the new Inflation Reduction Act, the impending ruling is just one more hurdle to look past in a challenging year for climate politics.

With John Kerry retiring from his climate czar job, and campaign strategists calculating what a victory by Donald Trump in November could do to the government’s climate agenda, U.S. allies might be forgiven for thinking that this year is already a wash. . . .

Don’t forget to contact me directly if you have suggestions or ideas at dcallaway@callawayclimateinsights.com.

Follow us . . . .

Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram


Tuesday’s subscriber-only insights

The elusive Tesla Cybertruck.

Happy New Year. Except for Elon Musk

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Callaway Climate Insights to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 David Callaway
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More