Callaway Climate Insights

Share this post

It's logical: Scientists get heated about emissions from space tourism

www.callawayclimateinsights.com

It's logical: Scientists get heated about emissions from space tourism

Study finds that rockets' pollution is magnified at high altitudes.

Matthew Diebel
Jun 30, 2022
Share
Share this post

It's logical: Scientists get heated about emissions from space tourism

www.callawayclimateinsights.com
To be sure, the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701) is powered by a matter-antimatter warp drive, which is not real (yet), and which also does not produce any greenhouse gas emissions. Image: Wikimedia.

(A native of England, veteran journalist Matthew Diebel has worked at NBC News, Time, USA Today and News Corp., among other organizations. Having spent much of his childhood next to one of the world's fastest bodies of water, he is particularly interested in tidal energy.)

Earth to Captain Kirk/William Shatner: You are a major polluter. Not only do we have to imagine what damage a craft like the Starship Enterprise could have done to the stratosphere — those dilithium crystals! — but now we know that when you boldly went on your space flight on Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin rocket, it had a major impact.

Callaway Climate Insights is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The news, published in the journal Earth’s Future, was beamed up by a group of scientists in the U.K. and the U.S. who said that the growing space tourism industry could fuel significant global warming while also depleting the Earth’s crucial ozone layer.

A key focus of the study was emissions of black carbon, or soot, from the combustion of rocket fuel, which absorbs light from the sun for considerable periods and releases thermal energy, making it a powerful warming agent. At lower altitudes, black carbon quickly falls from the sky in days or weeks; with rockets, though, the soot-like substance for up to four years before falling back down to Earth, meaning that pollutants emitted in the stratosphere are nearly 500 times worse, the study found.

“A big ramp up in the number of space launches, which is hoped for by the space tourism industry, poses a risk to the climate by adding black carbon particles to the upper atmosphere and as a result, we should think very carefully about regulating this industry before it gets out of hand,” said Robert Ryan, a researcher at University College London and the study’s lead author. “It would be a real shame for humanity to look back in 50 or 100 years when we’ve got thousands of rocket launches a year and think, ‘If only we’d done something.’”

To be fair, the liquid hydrogen and oxygen used by Bezos’ rocket produce less black carbon than the SpaceX and Virgin Galactic craft backed by Elon Musk and Richard Branson, which burn solid fuels. However, with all three enterprises planning hundreds of flights in coming years, the backlash could be considerable.

Earth to Kirk: Get over space and get out.

Callaway Climate Insights is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Share
Share this post

It's logical: Scientists get heated about emissions from space tourism

www.callawayclimateinsights.com
Comments
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 David Callaway
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing